Scrut
RECEIPT NO. CP-2609-SCR
READ 2026-09-29
PLAN: No plan published
Not published
Short answer
On the what the price buys weights, Thoropass scores 4.90 to 2.40 against Scrut. Scrut scores higher on pricing transparency; Thoropass scores higher on expert services in a plan and audit and pen test path. Neither publishes a price, so neither can be shown to be cheaper.
By The Cost Desk, Compliance Pricing · Published 2026-09-29 · Prices and plans as published on vendor pages, read 2026-09-29.
Weights on this page default to the what the price buys ranking; see the price transparency view for the six-criterion weights.
| Criterion (weight) | Scrut | Thoropass | Higher |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency (20%) | 21 WhyScrut: The pricing URL returned Page Not Found on 2026-09-29; no plans or prices are published, though the site offers a Compliance Cost Calculator. Thoropass: The /pricing URL shows no prices and no plan list. | Scrut | |
| Entry plan contents (20%) | 11 WhyScrut: No plan is published. Thoropass: No plan is published. | Tie | |
| Stated plan limits (0%) | 11 WhyScrut: No plan limits are published. Thoropass: No plan limits are published. | Tie | |
| Expert services in a plan (30%) | 36 WhyScrut: The startup page mentions expert guidance and a playbook; no service is tied to a published plan. Thoropass: Describes an auditor-led model with in-house auditor support; plan inclusion is not published. | Thoropass | |
| Questionnaire allowance (0%) | 11 WhyScrut: No questionnaire allowance is published. Thoropass: No questionnaire allowance is published. | Tie | |
| Audit and pen test path (30%) | 39 WhyScrut: Offers an Internal Auditor agent; external audit and pen test paths are not described in the material reviewed. Thoropass: Automation and audit come from one company, with pen testing and vulnerability scanning on the platform; plan pricing is not published. | Thoropass | |
| Weighted total | 2.40 | 4.90 | Thoropass |
| Scrut | Thoropass | |
|---|---|---|
| Published price | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | Not published | Not published |
| Entry plan | No plan published | No plan published |
| Stated limits | Not published | Not published |
| Questionnaires per year | Not published | Not published |
| Expert services | Not tied to a plan | In-house auditor support |
| Audit path | Offers an Internal Auditor agent. An external audit path is not described in the material we reviewed. | Automation and audit from the same company; the audit and assessment offering is led by an audit partner. |
| Penetration test | Not described in the material we reviewed. | Penetration testing and vulnerability scanning are part of the platform (PCI DSS work includes certified ASV scans). |
| Integrations stated | 150+ integrations (in the Evidence Collector description) | Not published (integrations are described as vetted and approved by auditors) |
| Frameworks stated | 70+ frameworks on the home page (the startup page says 60+) | No total count published; lists SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS, HITRUST e1/i1/r2, HIPAA, CMMC L1, NIST CSF 2.0, Cyber Essentials |
RECEIPT NO. CP-2609-SCR
READ 2026-09-29
PLAN: No plan published
Not published
RECEIPT NO. CP-2609-THO
READ 2026-09-29
PLAN: No plan published
Not published
Neither publishes a price, so neither can be shown to be cheaper. Ask both for a quote on the same scope: frameworks, headcount, audit and pen test.
They tie on stated plan limits. Scrut: No plan limits are published. Thoropass: No plan limits are published.
Thoropass scores higher on expert services in a plan. Scrut: The startup page mentions expert guidance and a playbook; no service is tied to a published plan. Thoropass: Describes an auditor-led model with in-house auditor support; plan inclusion is not published.